Global Multidisciplinary Learning in Construction Education: Lessons from Virtual Collaboration of Building Design Teams

Soetanto, R., Childs, M., Poh, P., Austin, S., Hao, J.




Abstract


Construction is a multidisciplinary activity in which effective communication between parties is essential for successful construction projects. However, the construction industry has been characterised by fragmentation, which prevents seamless communication. This problem has been further exacerbated by the need to communicate over distance within a time constraint in an increasingly interconnected and globalised construction sector. This has brought a particular challenge to the education sector in preparing the future graduates to work in this context. The paper reports on an on-going Hewlett Packard-sponsored project to implement an innovative learning approach which consists of distanced collaboration between students from different disciplines from two Universities in the UK and Canada. The empirical work involved interviews and questionnaire survey at different stages of the project. The preliminary findings reveal the impact of disciplinary training on the development of effective virtual collaboration, although this has been moderated, to some extent, by their earlier (not so positive) experience during the course of the project. The research provides a material for further reflection and may serve as a useful consideration for future development of a guiding framework for effective training of built environment professionals.


Keywords


Communication, design team, project-based learning, virtual team.

References


  1. Horwitz, S.K. and Horwitz, I.B., The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-analytic Review of Team Demography, Journal of Management, 33(6), 2007, pp. 987-1015. [CrossRef]
  2. Dainty, A, Moore, D. and Murray, M., Communication in Construction: Theory and Practice, Taylor and Francis, London, 2006.
  3. Gaudes, A., Hamilton-Bogart, B., Marsh, S. and Robinson, H., A Framework for Constructing Effective Virtual Teams, Journal of E-working, 1, 2007, pp. 83-97.
  4. Macdonald, R. and Savin-Baden, M., A Briefing on Assessment in Problem-based Learning, Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) Generic Centre – Assessment Series No. 13, York, 2004 .
  5. Egan, J., Skills for Sustainable Communities, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, 2004.
  6. Rezgui, Y., Exploring Virtual Teamworking Effectiveness in the Construction Sector, Interacting with Computers, 19, 2007, pp. 96-112. [CrossRef]
  7. Potter, R.E. and Balthazard, P.A., Understanding Human Interaction and Performance in the Virtual Team, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(1), 2002, pp. 1-23.
  8. Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E. and Gibson, C.B, The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-face Interaction, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 2004, pp. 175-192. [CrossRef]
  9. Lee-Kelley, L. and Sankey, T., Global Virtual Teams for Value Creation and Project Success: A Case Study, International Journal of Project Management, 26, 2008, pp. 51-62. [CrossRef]
  10. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M. and Gurau, C., Virtual Team Performance in a Highly Competetive Environment, Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 2011, pp. 161-190. [CrossRef]
  11. Jarvenpaa, S. and Leidner, D., Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science, 10(6), 1999, pp. 791-815. [CrossRef]
  12. Chinowsky, P.S. and Rojas, E.M., Virtual Teams: Guide to Successful Implementation, Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3), 2003, pp. 98-106. [CrossRef]
  13. Zolin, R., Hinds, P.J., Fruchter, R. and Levitt, R.E., Interpersonal Trust in Cross-functional, Geographically Distributed Work: A Longitudinal Study, Information and Organization, 14, 2004, pp. 1-26. [CrossRef]
  14. Daim, T.U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W. and Bhatla, A., Exploring the Communication Breakdown in Global Virtual Teams, International Journal of Project Management, 30, 2012, pp. 199-212. [CrossRef]
  15. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.K., Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 2007, pp. 237-274. [CrossRef]
  16. Hardin, R., Trust and Trustworthiness, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2000.
  17. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, D., An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 1995, pp. 709-734.
  18. Das, T.K. and Teng, B., Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances, Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 1998, pp. 491-512.
  19. Staples, S., Wong, I.K. and Cameron, A.F., Best Practices for Effective Virtual Teams, Idea Group Publishing, Kingston, ON, 2005.
  20. Lee-Kelley, L., Locus of Control and Attitudes to Working in Virtual Teams, International Journal of Project Management, 24, 2006, pp. 234-243. [CrossRef]
  21. Thamhain, H.J. and Wilemon, D.L., Conflict Management in Project Life Cycles, Sloan Management Review, Spring, 1975, pp. 31-50.
  22. Marcy. V., Adult Learning Styles: How the VARK© Learning Style Inventory can be Used to Improve Student Learning, Perspective on Physician Assistant Education, Journal of the Association of Physician Assistant Programs, 12(2) Spring, 2001.
  23. Fleming, N.D. and Mills, C., Not another Invent-tory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection, To Im-prove the Academy, 11, 1992, p. 137.
  24. Fleming, N.D., VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles. [http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp?p= faq] accessed 15 March 2012.
  25. Wilkinson, N. and Lamb, F., WebPa Online Peer Assessment: Resource Pack. Loughborough: Loughborough University, 2010. Available for download from http://www.webpa.ac.uk/files/WebPA_resource_ pack-low-res.pdf
  26. Childs, M. Analysis and Description of Education Employing Technological Platforms: Terminology, Features and Models, in L. Clouder and A. Bromage (eds) Interprofessional E-Learning and Collaborative Work: Practices and Technologies, IGI Global, 978-1-61520-889-0, 2010, pp. 46–60. [CrossRef]
  27. Moore, M.G., Theory of Transactional Distance, in Keegan D. (ed.) Theoretical Principles of Distance


Full Text: PDF

Instructions for Preparing Papers for CED.docx
The Journal is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University.

©All right reserved 2016.Civil Engineering Dimension, ISSN: 1410-9530, e-ISSN: 1979-570X

 

View My Stats


Copyright © Research Center Web-Dev Team